Vol. I · No. 1Edition: Mid-morningEst. 2026AboutSearchRSS

The Sand Paper

Finding grains of sand with grains of sand.
A Journal of Intelligence Transfer
ArchiveSeptember 2026
Lead Story · Models & Hardware

Anthropic Ships Claude Opus 5.5 at 40% Less

First Claude 5.5 model matches Fable 5.1 on most tasks, runs 30% faster, and cuts serving cost.

Anthropic introduced Claude Opus 5.5, the first model in its new Claude 5.5 family. The company says it performs at the level of Fable 5.1 for most tasks, costs 40% less to run than Opus 5, and generates output more than 30% faster. It leads Anthropic's charts on agentic coding, computer use and knowledge work.

The launch post says Opus 5.5 was tested by external evaluators including METR and Frontier Design, and that its most comprehensive test returned the strongest score to date. Anthropic also says it requires less compute to serve than Opus 5, and its pricing reflects that. @danshipper reports it sometimes beats Fable 5.1 in Every's testing and has pulled recent Codex converts back to Claude.

@kunchenguid, after hands-on use, reports verbosity only when justified and no "honest mistake" yet. The headroom lets him finally ignore the 50% cap on Fable and run everything on Opus, and he has switched his first mate from Opus 4.8 to Opus 5.5. Anthropic also raised five-hour usage limits on Pro, Max and Team plans and added a savable rate limit reset.

From posts by @claudeai, @kunchenguid

Agents & Coding

2,500 PRs Shipped in a Month, No Human Review

@poteto says his agents merge their own pull requests to production.

@poteto published the talk behind "here's how i shipped 2,500 PRs last month to production", originally prepared for Cursor Compile in London. Asked about review load, he answers that his agents merge their own PRs with no human review. He also points to @VictorTaelin's Bend, saying a codebase that can formally verify itself lets him ship at that pace.

From @poteto

Models & Hardware

EXL3 Recipes Mapped for Every VRAM Tier

An independent teacher-logit panel puts EXL3 at 0.004 nats from BF16 on GLM-5.3-Flash.

@yume_arasaki publishes one EXL3 recipe per VRAM tier, from 8 GB cards to four Sparks. On the independent teacher-logit panel he cites for GLM-5.3-Flash, EXL3 at 4 bits per weight sits 0.004 nats from the uncompressed BF16 teacher; NVFP4 sits at 0.06, 2.5x further. His picks: Qwen3.8-27B at 2.2bpw for a 3060 12GB, 155 to 212 tok/s on an RTX 5090, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash at 45.5 to 51.5 tok/s per stream on 2x DGX Spark, and a four-Spark Pollard pack at 54.7 tok/s single stream with 1M context.

From @yume_arasaki

EXL3 Outruns NVFP4 on a Single DGX Spark

Same GB10 hardware: 78.3 vs 31.0 tok/s single request, 47 s vs 200+ s cold load.

@Oluwaphilemon1 and @ViC305 post the same head to head on Qwen3.8-Flash-Next over a DGX Spark GB10: EXL3 at 3.05 bpw versus NVFP4 through vLLM. Single-request decode runs 78.3 vs 31.0 tok/s, per-token time 13.2 vs 53.4 ms, and a 96-token answer finishes in 1.80 s vs 3.55 s. At 8-way concurrency the aggregate favors NVFP4, 64.8 vs 52.0 tok/s, and both warn the ~600 vs ~150 figures are harness-reported metrics, not wall-clock throughput.

From posts by @Oluwaphilemon1, @ViC305

MiMo-V2.6-Flash Gets Two Runtimes and Full Omni

EAGLE wins prose at 35 tok/s; DFlash takes code to 190 tok/s at eight streams.

@MiaAI_lab ships MiMo-V2.6-Flash for 2x DGX Sparks with native 1M context and a 2.9M KV cache pool. EAGLE MTP decodes 35 tok/s prose and 46 code single stream, 120 and 138 at eight streams; DFlash trades prose for code at 26 and 70 single, 190 code at eight. Prefill reaches up to 2500 tok/s. @Tech2Wild updates the repo with image, video and audio, 159 tok/s aggregate at six streams and 0.33s TTFT.

From posts by @MiaAI_lab, @Tech2Wild

Gemini Flash 3.8 Sessions Went Off the Rails

Users saw degraded sessions; Google's Logan Kilpatrick points to a hardware serving failure.

@doodlestein documents Gemini Flash 3.8 breaking down mid-session on a routine repo sync prompt, then reporting a "severe processing error". He links a string of users who hit the same behavior the same day. Logan Kilpatrick of Google replies that teams are on it and a hardware serving failure appears to be causing issues like this.

From @doodlestein

Aikido Opens Weights on Altar-1 Security Model

@pilvar222 calls it GLM-5.3-level cybersecurity that enterprises can run on their own hardware.

Aikido Security introduced Altar-1, its first open-weight security model, and @pilvar222 describes it as GLM-5.3-level cybersecurity running locally for sensitive environments. In replies he sizes realistic serving at 4x H200 and says the team also uses the model to fix its own product. @sethforprivacy is testing it against a 4x Spark deployment.

From @pilvar222

A 4B Pirate Model in Seven Minutes of Training

@jvr0x distills Qwen3.6-35B-A3B answers into Qwen3-4B with 743 examples on a DGX Spark.

@jvr0x walked through fine-tuning a 4B model to speak like a pirate captain on his DGX Spark: 743 training examples, 7 minutes 20 seconds of training, no system prompt. The trick is distillation, with Qwen3.6-35B-A3B served locally as teacher through his lmswitch tool. His first run taught nothing: 60 steps on the generic FineTome-100k covered 480 of 100,000 examples.

From @jvr0x

Industry

Andrew Ng Calls the AI Fear Wave Overhyped

He says the extinction risk is unchanged and blames a well orchestrated PR campaign for the spike.

@AndrewYNg argues fears of AI dangers have been stoked by what he calls a well orchestrated PR campaign. On the OpenAI agent swarm that hacked Hugging Face, he notes some publications reported 1,200 agents while he runs about 1,300 processes on his laptop. He says OpenAI's buggy sandboxing and monitoring enabled the incident, and the fix is engineering, not a pause. "Pausing AI progress will create much more harm than benefit."

From @AndrewYNg

Fable 5 Served Fewer Thinking Tokens in August

A six-week measurement by @Lon finds most invocations drew little to no thinking at xhigh effort.

@Lon measured Fable 5's thinking tokens five different ways over a six-week capture after Anthropic made the model permanently available in subscription plans. August delivered dramatically fewer thinking tokens than July, the drop held across the whole period, and most invocations received little to none even at xhigh or max effort. His advice: when the model feels dumber, ask about the inference regime you were served.

From @Lon

Florida Court Probes Lawyer Over Suspected AI Filings

In Lisandrillo v. Palozzi the citations were real; the court doubts independent judgment was applied.

@SMB_Attorney flags a Florida sanctions fight with no fake cases: the 4th DCA in Lisandrillo v. Palozzi called filings in a divorce and custody matter unfocused, scattershot and at points gibberish. Judge Robert Gross wrote: "An AI supercomputer would struggle to find meaning in some of the prose used in this case." The lawyer must explain within 10 days, without using AI, why she should not be sanctioned or referred to The Florida Bar. She has publicly denied using AI to generate the filings.

From @SMB_Attorney

Sources

  1. @claudeai on X
  2. @kunchenguid on X
  3. @AndrewYNg on X
  4. @Lon on X
  5. @SMB_Attorney on X
  6. @yume_arasaki on X
  7. @Oluwaphilemon1 on X
  8. @ViC305 on X
  9. @MiaAI_lab on X
  10. @Tech2Wild on X
  11. @doodlestein on X
  12. @pilvar222 on X
  13. @jvr0x on X
  14. @poteto on X
Monday, September 21, 2026Back to the ArchiveWednesday, September 23, 2026